|
Post by GSC Admin on Feb 2, 2004 18:15:52 GMT -5
Oh my god, the far right is up in arms now! They saw a boob! They have already launched a investigation which is about more that the president has done over Iraq and the leaker. If conservatives would take things that are serious, seriously, we would all be better off and less stressfull. I mean, what is wrong with it?
|
|
|
Post by GoreSupporterNJ on Feb 2, 2004 23:17:20 GMT -5
I say, who cares? I wasn't watching it anyway. I was watching the Moveon ad on CNN. I switched over early, and good thing I did. CNN played it before Moveon told its members to tune in. Jan
|
|
|
Post by GoreSupporterNJ on Feb 3, 2004 12:19:13 GMT -5
I received this from Move on:
Dear MoveOn member, I just wanted to send you a quick note to let you know what happened to "Child's Pay" during the Super Bowl last night.
Hundreds of thousands of us switched over to CNN to watch "Child's Pay" at exactly 8:10 and 8:35pm EST –- the precise times CNN had promised us. The ad actually ran at 8:19 and 8:39pm, still during half-time but not at the exact times promised.
CNN's going to refund a big chunk of the cost for running the ad last night, and that money will be put into running "Child's Pay" in our target states. Despite the hurdles from CBS and CNN, "Child's Pay" will continue to air. Thanks again for being a part of this nation-wide campaign.
Sincerely, --Eli Pariser MoveOn.org Voter Fund February 2nd, 2004 Seems to me we should be investigating the REAL BOOBS in our media. Just as an aside though, that was one ugly picture of Janet Jackson, and to be honest I didn't understand the point of what she did. Jan
|
|
|
Post by earthmother on Feb 3, 2004 16:01:43 GMT -5
Oh, my eyes! My eyes! Where's John Ashcroft when you need him to cover up a boob? What depraved people we will all become for witnessing . . . oh, horrors . . . a naked breast! Oh, save me . . .
|
|
|
Post by bluebutterfly on Mar 23, 2004 13:32:19 GMT -5
I'm glad I didn't see it but I think they're making a big deal out of nothing. If a baby saw it it'd think, "LUNCH!"
Ohmy. You have a picture of it. Well, it's unrecognizable from all the tin adorning it. Aren't they just not supposed to show the nipple and I say the nipples hidden so what's the problem?
|
|
|
Post by earthmother on Mar 23, 2004 14:44:57 GMT -5
There was no problem, Butterfly, except for the extreme right-wingers who think that perverts are spawned by witnessing something like that. Yeah, it was inappropriate in the context, but good lord, to make such a big deal out of it--do they really think anyone was damaged by that image? Hey, here's a thought Maybe George W. Bush saw too many flashes of naked boobs in his younger days and that's what damaged his brain and is responsible for his thieving and lying?
|
|
|
Post by DemocraticVolunteer on Jun 12, 2004 14:59:22 GMT -5
LOL..... Yeah Chris u have a pic. of that. How long have you been looking for that pic. LOL. Just joking. But i don't think that it was an accident. Many people do. If it wasn't an accident why was she wearing that on her nipple. Guess she thought it was confortable. It was probably just a stunt for justin to get back at Brittney Spears.
|
|
|
Post by earthmother on Jun 12, 2004 16:00:56 GMT -5
I'd have to agree it was no accident. She'd have responded a lot faster if it had been a surprise. A wardrobe malfunction, my foot.
|
|